Just a quick guerilla post to point anyone who might be reading at a worthy initiative - the Scientia Pro Publica blog carnival, which as I understand it is a regular initiative to bring interesting science to the attention of the general public.
I’ll let Stephen Curry, the host of this edition, fill you in on the details. More can be found at this post from his blog, Reciprocal Space, including a link to the submission form. Here’s Stephen…
“…if you’ve read or written a blogpost about science, nature or medicine in the last couple of weeks that you think might enchant or enthrall a public audience, please think about submitting it to the carnival.”
The submission form has more detail on the general idea behind Scientia:
The purpose of this blog carnival is simple: to provide a large public platform that celebrates the best science, nature and medical writing published within the previous month in the blogosphere. This means the host should be able to understand what you’ve written. If the host can’t understand it, neither will the public. Acceptable submissions include “translations” of scientific papers, original essays about a scientific topic or theme, and reviews of books about science. Other submissions may or may not be accepted at the current host’s discretion. Topics range from basic to applied sciences; from physics, chemistry and biology to pharmacology and medicine. Scientia is published on the first and third Monday of each month, and of course, because this is a traveling blog carnival, it is seeking hosts.
Submissions will be published on Monday, March 1, so you’ve got a little time to either write something, or snag a post from the last couple of weeks or so. Of course, since it’s ongoing, you can contribute as often, or as infrequently, as you like.
Go on, you know you want to.
Showing posts with label Nature Network. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nature Network. Show all posts
Friday, February 19, 2010
Friday, December 05, 2008
Arriving
Every now and then, when I despair of finding anything worth reading on the Internet, I come across something like this little gem from Nature Network blogger extraordinaire Richard Grant. Now, he blogs eloquently and wittily on a consistent basis (in at least three places I'm aware of, and probably more besides), but sometimes he outdoes himself.
What grabs me most in his post is his description (in part) of what he likes about a career in science:
"I also love taking people and showing them something new: looking down the microscope and saying will you look at this!... and that enthusiasm for the natural world, that wonder at its beauty and coherence, is what has kept me a scientist."
Sentiments I can relate to, really, even though I spend precious little time these days doing science, and none whatsoever at the laboratory bench. Yes, you can do science in front of a computer, even if you're a biologist. Trust me on this. Even in front of a screen, I still get that "wow" moment from time to time, when something jumps out of the data and says "Hey! Here's something about the way life works that you didn't know before! In fact, here's something that nobody knew before!" Precious moments in between the routine, the reporting, the grant writing, the administration.
Earlier in his post, Richard also muses about why he got into the whole thing in the first place:
"Maybe it was because I couldn’t think of anything anything better to do?"
Which is, I think, meant to be a bit tongue-in-cheek (difficult to believe where Dr. Grant is involved, I know). But I too have often thought that I became a "scientist" because (a) it seemed interesting, and (b) I couldnt' think of anything better to do, either. And yes, it's hauled me around a bit, in and out of industry and to and from humans and their diseases, and nearly-microscopic worms and the secrets of their nervous systems, among other things... but ultimately has gotten me where I am now, through a series of events that make up a story far too tedious to go into in detail (so that'll be next week's blog post, then).
As RPG considers the next phase of his illustrious (or should we say "interesting"?) career, his post makes me think of my own - through this and that, I actually feel as though I've "arrived" somewhere... namely right here, in my current position. That's not to imply that there aren't other places to go. But after this many years, my career seems to be well in order, which is not something I would have said at any time in my life until just about now. Fortunately, Richard has unintentionally managed to remind me of this. So thanks, mate, and good luck with whatever's next.
What grabs me most in his post is his description (in part) of what he likes about a career in science:
"I also love taking people and showing them something new: looking down the microscope and saying will you look at this!... and that enthusiasm for the natural world, that wonder at its beauty and coherence, is what has kept me a scientist."
Sentiments I can relate to, really, even though I spend precious little time these days doing science, and none whatsoever at the laboratory bench. Yes, you can do science in front of a computer, even if you're a biologist. Trust me on this. Even in front of a screen, I still get that "wow" moment from time to time, when something jumps out of the data and says "Hey! Here's something about the way life works that you didn't know before! In fact, here's something that nobody knew before!" Precious moments in between the routine, the reporting, the grant writing, the administration.
Earlier in his post, Richard also muses about why he got into the whole thing in the first place:
"Maybe it was because I couldn’t think of anything anything better to do?"
Which is, I think, meant to be a bit tongue-in-cheek (difficult to believe where Dr. Grant is involved, I know). But I too have often thought that I became a "scientist" because (a) it seemed interesting, and (b) I couldnt' think of anything better to do, either. And yes, it's hauled me around a bit, in and out of industry and to and from humans and their diseases, and nearly-microscopic worms and the secrets of their nervous systems, among other things... but ultimately has gotten me where I am now, through a series of events that make up a story far too tedious to go into in detail (so that'll be next week's blog post, then).
As RPG considers the next phase of his illustrious (or should we say "interesting"?) career, his post makes me think of my own - through this and that, I actually feel as though I've "arrived" somewhere... namely right here, in my current position. That's not to imply that there aren't other places to go. But after this many years, my career seems to be well in order, which is not something I would have said at any time in my life until just about now. Fortunately, Richard has unintentionally managed to remind me of this. So thanks, mate, and good luck with whatever's next.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)