Sunday, February 22, 2009

We now return you to your regularly-scheduled, non-automobile-related, programming.

Lamborghini Gallardo roadster

I've been a bit absent recently... busy, among other things, editing around a hundred or so shots from the Canadian International Autoshow, which I attended for the first time ever (believe it or not) about a week ago. I'll avoid deluging you with all of them, but in my usual style I'll hand out a few arbitrary and tongue-in-cheek awards.

Nicest presentation
The Lamborghini display. They had their cars up on a low podium, eliminating the need for silly barriers and ropes that get in the way of photography. Here's an LP 640 roadster, staring you down. The white LP 560 roadster at the top of the post was right next to it.
Lamborghini Murcielago (front view)

Biggest surprise
A Ferrari 288 GTO, lurking in the exhibitor booths. Ridiculously fast and very rare. My photos of it aren't terribly good, unfortunately. Twin-turbo V8 goodness, from 1984.
Ferrari 288 GTO

Friendliest owner
The guy at the paintball emporium's booth, who let me under the ropes to photograph his Ferrari 360 Spider. Maybe he was feeling relaxed since a Playboy Bunny was doing all the heavy lifting, talking to prospective clients. There she is in the background, at the strange intersection of exotic sportscars, fantasy warfare, and adult entertainment.
Ferrari 360 Spider

Most photogenic
Not the aforementioned bunny, but this Mercedes-McLaren SLR Roadster 722 S. It might also win for "most unwieldy name", although the Ferrari F430 16M Scuderia Spider gives it a run for its money there. Unreasonably pointy and very expensive, with silly doors.
Mercedes McLaren SLR Roadster 722S

Nicest rims
The Maybach. Just love that logo and the overall shiny goodness of these.
Maybach wheel

Prettiest Corvette in the historic Corvette display
Hard to choose, but I have to go with this 1953 C1 convertible. Just love those red rims and whitewall tires.
1953 C1 Corvette convertible

Best use of a hexagonal design element
The Honda FC ("fuel cell") Sport concept car. Extra points for environmental friendliness, but a penalty for not actually having the powerplant installed.
Honda FC Sport Concept

And finally (for now, anyway):

Nicest car that I actually sat in
Mercedes-Benz SL63 AMG Roadster. I'm not usually a big fan of Merc roadsters, but I think I could just about deal with owning this one.
Mercedes SL63 AMG

There you go. Lots more to see in this Flickr set, if, as Mr. Bennett says in Pride and Prejudice, you can bear to.

Saturday, February 07, 2009

On reading Charles Darwin's autobiography

Darwin Road, Toronto



"There is something in that young man that interests me."
– Sir J. Mackintosh, on Charles Darwin, 1827


And so it's upon us - Darwin Day, the 12th of February, 2009.

In sorting through the writings of Charles Darwin for something that I could read and write about, I quickly realized that a lot of his works are very dense, very long, and deal with subjects that, quite frankly, don't interest me that much. A case in point: the lengthy monograph The formation of vegetable mould through the action of worms, with observations on their habits, or the succinctly-titled, but equally daunting, Coral Reefs. Even those that are available as audio books would take hours and hours of listening to wade through.

Baffled and bewildered, and growing increasingly desperate, I stumbled upon an absolute gem: Darwin's autobiography, edited and annotated by his son Francis. Tipping the scales at a mere 38 pages once I'd shoehorned the Project Gutenberg version into a Word document, it's turned out to be just what I was looking for: engaging, conversational, full of interesting anecdotes, and refreshingly free of sentences like "In the latter case, water charged with excrementitious and decaying matter would be slowly forced outwards, and would bathe the quadrifids, if Iam right in believing that the concave lobes contract after a time like those of Dionaea." (from Insectivorous Plants).

Darwin, it seems, didn't feel that he was a particularly interesting person, which seems a little surprising given his impact on science over the past, oh, 170 years or so. And this assertion isn't supported by the anecdotes in his autobiography, some of which I will gleefully quote here:

On his early years at day school:
“I believe that I was in many ways a naughty boy”

This sentiment is echoed in his later observation about his years at Cambridge:
“I had been rather extravagant at Cambridge, and to console my father, said, "that I should be deuced clever to spend more than my allowance whilst on board the Beagle;" but he answered with a smile, "But they tell me you are very clever."”

The idea of Darwin as a cheeky schoolboy, or a dissolute youth, really hadn't occurred to me before. He was also, apparently, an exceptionally good shot and an avid hunter, skills which would benefit him in his later travels as he collected his way through South America and beyond, in side trips from the HMS Beagle.

The autobiography does, however, reveal a lot that we might have suspected, such as an early passion for collecting insects. At Cambridge, he relates that "...one day, on tearing off some old bark, I saw two rare beetles, and seized one in each hand; then I saw a third and new kind, which I could not bear to lose, so that I popped the one which I held in my right hand into my mouth. Alas! it ejected some intensely acrid fluid, which burnt my tongue so that I was forced to spit the beetle out, which was lost, as was the third one."

Now that's dedication.

As the book progresses, more interesting facts come to light, such as his arguments with his friend, fellow collector, and ship-master FitzRoy about slavery, which Darwin vehemently opposed. At the same time, he reveals that he is keenly aware of experimental bias:
“We had several quarrels; for instance, early in the voyage at Bahia, in Brazil, he defended and praised slavery, which I abominated, and told me that he had just visited a great slave-owner, who had called up many of his slaves and asked them whether they were happy, and whether they wished to be free, and all answered "No." I then asked him, perhaps with a sneer, whether he thought that the answer of slaves in the presence of their master was worth anything? This made him excessively angry, and he said that as I doubted his word we could not live any longer together.”

Fortunately, they managed to patch up their relationship, so that Darwin could complete the Beagle voyage, an event that he refers to as “the first real training or education of my mind”.

The rest of the book, remembering that it's not very long, is a dense narrative of his interactions with various learned scholars, and a rather nice summary of his writing, including of course discussion of the famous On the Origin of Species. It's a fascinating read, and contains a few more quotable gems, my favourite of which has to be this one:

"I remember when in Good Success Bay, in Tierra del Fuego, thinking (and, I believe, that I wrote home to the effect) that I could not employ my life better than in adding a little to Natural Science."

Brilliant understatement from a brilliant man. I'll let him finish up in characteristically modest style, with the final words of the autobiography:

"Therefore my success as a man of science, whatever this may have amounted to, has been determined, as far as I can judge, by complex and diversified mental qualities and conditions. Of these, the most important have been—the love of science—unbounded patience in long reflecting over any subject—industry in observing and collecting facts—and a fair share of invention as well as of common sense. With such moderate abilities as I possess, it is truly surprising that I should have influenced to a considerable extent the belief of scientific men on some important points."

He obviously had some idea of the impact of his discoveries at the time; but even he couldn't have imagined the discussion they'd engender, two hundred years after his birth and one hundred and fifty after the publication of his most famous work.

Happy Darwin Day, everyone.

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Why is science important?

Alom Shaha has an interesting project on the go: a "film and blog project" he calls Why Is Science Important?, which he tells you all about right here. The tagline, encapsulating the idea behind this very nicely, is

"A collection of thoughts from leading scientists, public figures, ...and you."

I've added the emphasis on "and you" to, um, emphasize that anyone can contribute. And I'd encourage anyone who might happen to be reading this blog to give it some thought, if it seems important to you, and send something along. Notable Nature Network blogger and occasional Ricardiblog commenter Richard P. Grant contributed this piece, arguing in his inimitable style that science is "beautiful and essential". And I've put in my own two cents' worth, in this article about how scientific method makes us better able to cope with the barrage of information around us. Unfortunately, it turns out that Jenny Rohn, a much, much better writer than I, made a similar point earlier, in this nicely articulated piece. Ah well.

So - I'd encourage you to peruse Alom's site. It contains contributions from all manner of folks, from a man who's constructing the world's most accurate thermometer, to this very musical physicist, to a 12-year-old student. There are some lovely thoughts buried in there. My favourite so far is astronomer Seth Shostak's quiet understatement:

"Science is, very simply, our future."

Go and have a look. It's well worth the read.